Hamlet is one of Shakespeare’s most popular plays, and it’s been on my mind recently as I prepare for an upcoming lecture on it. I enjoy, in the course of reading the plays, considering as well some of the onscreen performances of the play. That is appropriate because my course focuses on the performance aspects of the play.
Hawke’s Hamlet is not my favorite of those I look at in class (Gibson and Olivier being the others, and now adding in the Chinese production The Banquet). I think some of the performers are too self-conscious. But it isn’t just that. It is also that, in many ways, the language isn’t fully believable in the setting, which is sad. Normally, I am perfectly fine with keeping the original language in a modern setting, but it just wasn’t quite pulled off in this version. (It’s some of the same feeling I get from Romeo + Juliet.)
I liked some things about the film though. I liked the film-within-the film, and thought it was a nice adaptation of the original play-withing-the-play. And the “To be or not to be” scene was pretty nicely done, set in the action section of a video rental shop. That makes for a nice contrast with the inaction Hamlet is sucked into.
In a previous post, I wrote a review the recent Chinese big-budget adaptation of Hamlet, The Banquet. It was a very well-made movie, and has been on my mind often since I watched it toward the end of last year. I loved the scene where the Hamlet character did a prolonged consideration of the importance of masks and making a mask of one’s face. I thought it was an excellent demonstration of the importance of theatricality in the play. It translated very well into this film version. I actually liked it much better than Hawke’s performance.
That said, Hawke’s performance, and the whole film, has something to be said for it. I think it is an interesting film to consider in a study of the play and its adaptations onto the screen.